***PLEASE BOOKMARK THIS PAGE AND CHECK BACK AS WE MAKE OUR UP-DATES!***

OUR COMMENTS ON THE NIGHT THE PRORAM AIRED: I have just finished watching the program, boy was it manipulative!  After an hour of fighting with straw-men arguments, sophistry, lies by omission and lawyer-like arguments the closing narrative was pretty much: "Hey you official conspiracy theory disbelievers, stop questioning the party line and upsetting the relatives of the deceased!". (Not an exact quote!)

COMMENTS FROM SOME OF OUR VISITORS: -

"I saw the program on Sunday.  You could tell it was done by the BBC by the way that they played down every single detail and blatantly lied all the way through trying to cover it all up" Phillip

"They didn't cover any of the solid arguments against the official story of 9/11, they just focused on the weaker arguments that some have made" Marie

"Did you see that program on BBC2 last night?  I had never even thought about an alternative to what we have been told about the September 11th attacks.  After last night I now think that it was probably an inside job.  Aren't some people evil, it doesn't bear thinking about" Lorraine

"Do we know which version that was?? I reckon it was the whitewash. If it wasn't, I'd hate to see what the whitewash was like!!!"  Martin

"...watched the BBC sham of a documentary about 9/11 conspiracies. They have done the victims of the 9/11 tragedy a total disservice..." Ian

"I would thank the BBC for broadcasting a program that was so blatantly biased that even more people will question the official version of events" Sue

The documentary is now available to watch : -

EXTERNAL ARTICLES REGARDING THE PROGRAM: -

• "9/11: The Conspiracy Files" - The BBC Joins The Ranks of the Untrustworthy US Media

• BBC: "Conspiracy on conspiracy" - Isn't it funny how the more Rudin tries to deny there is a conspiracy, the guilter he appears.

• BBC Discredited; Retractions on 9/11 Hit Piece Forthcoming - Complaint responses suggest consternation within corporation on revelations of bias in Conspiracy Files documentary, indicates large number of complaints received

• BBC's 9/11 Conspiracy Files - Points Which Were Ignored

• Producer Struggles to Defend Flaws & Bias of BBC Hit Piece - Guy Smith says 'we can debate these issues all day' without being able to debate any of them

• MUST READ!: BBC Hit Piece a Tissue of Lies, Bias and Emotional Manipulation - Outraged truth community demands answers from Guy Smith, immediate retractions and apologies urged, savage agenda driven yellow journalism an insult to the truth

• What did 9 11: The Conspiracy Files leave out? Here are just ten examples

• BBC Conspiracy Files - more than a hit-piece, a whitewash

• BBC vs 9/11 Truth: The Smear Begins - Here comes a load of manure from the the BBC

• BBC vs 9/11 Truth: The Smear Continues - Here comes another load of manure from the BBC!

• Debunking the BBC's 9-11 Conspiracy Files

• BBC Pressured to Air 9/11 Hit Piece? - Crane claims two different versions exist, former Fox exec demanding attack dogs released to prevent harm to American market

• BBC Implies 9/11 Truth Movement a Cult of Mythology - Believing that a mass murdering psychopathic state controls the world makes us feel comfortable, according to the "experts"

• BBC 9/11 Documentary Likely Hit Piece - Obsessive focus on strawman theories say individuals interviewed for upcoming show

• MP3 Audio: Alex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson Discuss the BBC Hit Piece on KLBJ - Recorded immediately after the UK airing of the documentary

• MP3 Audio: Alex Jones, Dylan Avery & Paul Joseph Watson Discuss the BBC Hit Piece with its Producer, Guy Smith - Recorded 19/02/2007

• WMA Audio: John Conner (American based author of the book and website The Resistance Manifesto) and Joseph Skelton (UK based webmaster of cremationofcare.com) discuss the recent BBC hit piece on 9/11 - Recorded 23/02/2007

• WMA Audio: American talk show host Jack Blood and Joseph Skelton discuss the BBC Conspiracy Files program - Recorded 27/02/2007

• 02nd MARCH 2007 STORY FOR PERSPECTIVE: Attorney General halts BBC probe - The Attorney General has obtained an injunction against the BBC to stop it broadcasting an item about the cash for honours investigation. The injunction was obtained on Friday night at a hearing which lasted around two hours at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Lord Goldsmith's office said he had acted "completely independently of government" on the matter. The BBC said its reporting of the story is a matter of public interest.  (COMMENTARY: This kind of puts the BBC's 'Conspiracy Files' whitewash series into perspective, doesn't it?  To paraphrase the part time series producer Guy Smith; 'The government doesn't have any control over the BBC... how preposterous, we report the truth as we see it without any such influence'... really Guy?)

MAKE A COMPLAINT TO THE BBC:-

• Please feel free to contact the BBC via e-mail and leave your feedback (please remember to be professional and to the point): -

HelenBoaden.Complaints@bbc.co.uk

guy.smith@bbc.co.uk

mike.rudin@bbc.co.uk

Or go to bbc.co.uk and select the 'Make an Official Complaint' option.

OUR COMPLAINT TO THE BBC - PROVIDED AS AN EXAMPLE: -

To whom it may concern

I would like to express my disappointment in the BBC for airing such a slanted piece of what I can only call propaganda.

The program I refer to was the BBC2 piece The Conspiracy Files - 9/11.

Having seen some of your previous series regarding the backgrounds of the 'War on Terrorism' such as The Power of Nightmares (2004) I was, perhaps naively, hoping that this latest documentary would seek to cover some of the serious problems with the official story of 9/11. An issue that is currently being addressed by a vast percentage of the worlds population.

The 'independence' of the BBC coupled with the wealth of material on the subject should surely make such a task relatively easy, one might think?

At the same time, I appreciate that you aim to target the wider audience and that this is never as easy a task.

But having spoken to people in my social and professional circles I have yet to meet anyone at all who was not rather offended by the clearly politically motivated theme of 'Second guess the official government story of 9/11 and you are a paranoid buffoon'... particularly when the evidence to back up this notion was clearly handpicked to favour the speaker of the message.

This is the basis of my complaint to the BBC.

It is unfortunate that we in the UK must pay the BBC a monetary fee (via a 'middleman' - i.e. the VERY same government that expects us to go along with their invasion of the world and curtailment of our civil rights) for the freedom to own a television, only to be patronised and craftily labeled as dangerous or mad by it.

I understand that there are many others who have contacted the BBC to state their feelings on the issue and would therefore like to add my name to the list of complainants.

If at any point in the near future the BBC would like to make an apology for their patronising and overtly politically biased narrative in the 'Conspiracy Files' program which aired on BBC2 last night, this would do a great deal to re-kindle my own faith in the company.

I thank you for your time.

FURTHER STUDY OF 9/11 TRUTH: -

• Cremationofcare.com 9/11 Truth Archive

• UK Activism: Our affiliated regional website: 9/11 Truth Skipton

• UK Activism: The National UK & Ireland campaign nineeleven.co.uk

• USA Activism: 911truth.org

OUR COMMENTARY PRIOR TO THE SHOW AIRING: -

CLOSING THOUGHTS: On 11th September 2006, I attended a historic demonstration outside the American embassy in London.  Primarily, the purpose of the demo was to show our respects to the individuals who lost their lives and those who were affected by the horrific attacks of 9/11 five years previously.  Secondarily, the purpose was to show the people of London that we know what the real agenda was behind the attacks and who was responsible.  You can learn more about the demo at 911truthskipton.com in the Past Events section.

Despite some 'one to one' interest that we were able to generate with some staff members, the response was less than enthusiastic.  As far as I am aware, our presence outside the headquarters was not covered by any of the days reportage of the BBC, nor was any follow up report given.

It is important to note that this was at the same time that the BBC was making their 'well-balanced' documentary which will be airing in a 'prime-time' slot on channel Two tonight.  I would encourage the viewer to ask 'Why was this event not covered?'.

As was stated by David Shayler in a speech to the demonstrators: "The BBC has forgotten who pays their wages, it has also forgotten that it has a duty to be impartial and to air subjects of public concern and public interest."

This point will be emphasised tonight.  Amongst many of the people that I have spoken to about tonight's broadcast, it is quite apparent that this is going to be one of, if not the most scrutinised documentaries in the history of the BBC.

GET ACTIVE: Please let the 'Beeb' know your opinions of the show after you view this.