Newspapers - Have Your Say

There are a number of small things that you can do to get out your un-wanted and un-voiced feelings on any of the facets of the New World Order.  One of them is to write letters to the newspaper, be they local or national.

Remember that this is not about you.  It is not about making a name for yourself or making yourself feel 'important' by taking action, although there is nothing wrong with being proud of yourself for speaking out.  What you are doing is important, but primarily, your motive is to raise public awareness of truths that you know, but that the controlled mainstream media rarely touch upon.  To plant seeds and gain momentum.

And don't be afraid to invite disagreement from other readers.  My own personal experience, particularly in the UK, is that when people are confronted with a 'Readers Letter' that may appear (to the un-educated) as laughable and ridiculous (like covering prior knowledge of 911) they will jump upon the claimant with cynicism, sarcasm and do everything to make the person look like a fool.  You cannot take this personally, no matter how offensive their reply may be.  There will always remain a percentage of 'nay-sayers', who are stuck in their ways.  Your job is not to arrogantly wake people up, but to merely voice an opinion.  If people feel that your opinion has awoken them, then all the better.

As I say, this action is not about you and seeing your own name in print.  If this is all that you care about, then you are risking your loosing the main objective and alienating everyone that you are reaching.  (Fanaticism in other words).  So stay on the level of the people that you are trying to reach, even if you feel restrained.  This is the responsibility that you carry in taking the action.

The following is a letter that I wrote to a local paper called The Craven Herald which actually got printed.  I have in the past written letters to this newspaper and although I am always to some degree 'chuffed' with having my work published, the only 'buzz' I get is knowing that an idea that is normally a 'hot potato' is in there.

You will note that in the letter, I have subtly suggested ideas (keywords highlighted in yellow) that the Governments of the world are in cahoots to create a global ID system and that they have used 'convenient' crises to scare us into submission.  Not a new idea to anyone in the NWO research subject that can even spell the word B-I-L-D-E-R-B-E-R-G, yet without screaming bloody murder I have put the notion out there and now the readers that aren't perhaps 'clued in' can take it from there, as I haven't alienated them here with hardcore material (such as that of a staged 9/11).  

It would be nice to be able to go into such detail, but the specific platform in this case is inappropriate.  More importantly, if your letter quietly suggests that the government is corrupt, then the reader (who more than likely already fully knows this) may then take it from there and learn such facts (such as that of a staged 9/11) for themselves.  The evidence certainly shows that this is what is happening across the world.  People are starting off with an inclination of government corruption, to knowing the truth and researching the facts with the help of the alternative media.

Anyway, here is the letter I refer to...

Sir,

As a researcher into the corruption and dangers of government (both national and international), I wish to comment on the plans for mandatory national ID cards. I firmly believe that we should not risk surrendering our fundamental freedom and privacy to politicians and officials we cannot trust. They will happily take much of our most basic freedoms that allow us to function, and are openly using (and this is in their own words) 'convenient disasters' as a pretext to do so, as is shown by official sources at home and abroad.

It is claimed that ID cards will have advantages for citizens. They won't. Abroad they fail to combat crime, terrorism, or fraud. Those pushing the legislation must be fully aware of this. Yet the flaws are fully acceptable to them, perhaps because they have another agenda.

The ‘Orwellian’ ID card and more importantly, the related ‘National Identity Register’ database has nothing to do with personal security and everything to do with preparing the population to accept minute control of their lives, making dissent impossible. We cannot trust the government with the power over our lives that it currently has, let alone anything more.

Before your readers lightly accept that being fingerprinted and tracked for the rest of their lives is 'for their own good' on Tony Blair's and Charles Clarke's say-so, I would beg them to read about the detail of the proposals and see what huge power they may be about to hand to *any* future government.

As you can see, without theory or argumentative detail, I have presented an idea of government corruption (keywords and strings highlighted in yellow) and left it to the reader to decide and learn more.  Mission accomplished.